Home Services Support us Training Research Vacancies Staff only Contact us  
Russian Case Studies

Below are the stories of two women who were helped by the The Women's Crisis Centre "Ekaterina" as a result of the international project, "Life without Fear".

Diana
Diana was growing up in family where all decisions were made by her father. Physical violence was not present however constant  psychological pressure was - the father used to say quite frequently that she is the 'waste of space' and she was not going to grow into anybody worthy, because she is not capable of doing anything right therefore there was no point for her to attempt to achieve anything. The father arranged a marriage for her, she had not met her future spouse before marriage. Diana never rebelled, she often thought  that her future husband although 'foreign soul' however with time they might feel an affection and love for each other.

The violence began pretty much straight away after they had got married, her husband started belittling her, called her names and strictly controlled all family expenditures forcing Diana beg for money. Not long after the wedding she gave birth to their daughter, because of a child she put up with the abuse and violence. It is impossible to say when physical violence began as Diana kept quiet and silent having been scared about an impact it would have had on her daughter. Diana told that at times when her husband was angry he used to lose self-control and  walk naked in front of their daughter. She never mentioned being sexually abused by him however we can presume it did take place, if we 'read between lines' whilst listening to her story. The violence was also present in her husband's family, the father of her husband took him away from his mother and then not long after got married to another woman. His step-mother used to abuse him by starving him and keeping him locked in underground seller. Even being grown up he still was scared of darkness and slept with the light on.

When husband used to beat her and their child up, Diana used to run away to her neighbours and hide away on their balcony together with her daughter ( sometimes in winter being only dressed in nightwear). Often the husband used to not come home for days, sleep in other places away from home never letting her know where he was. Once he beat her up that much that broke her finger when she was trying to shield herself from his punches. In one of those violent attacks he tried to strangle her with intercom wire and threatened to kill her. The most horrific in her opinion is the state of panic and fear. Even now she still wakes up at night when she hears loud sounds and starts trembling until she remembers that they are divorced and do not live together anymore. He destroyed all her official documents, she is currently trying to reinstate her passport, driving license and other documents (he tore some of them apart and burnt others up).

When Diana came to a conclusion that she could not live like that anymore and next time he could have easily murder her. With the help of her friends she help informed the Police of Social Protection of Ekatherinburg city ( when in the past and in critical situations she used to call the Police they would come very rarely and even when they did they would often take her husband's side, Diana suspects he used to pay them off not to take action). The husband is quite wealthy man and owns several shops and cafes, part of his estate exists under other people names. Wives of rich tyrant-husbands in particular scared to inform the Police due to their husbands being wealthy enough to 'buy police silence' and knowing fully well that it would anger them even more.

Police employees who have an agreement to cooperate with the crisis centre "Ekaterina" decided to use the help of Centre psychologist. The psychologist  carried out research of Diana's condition and wrote the conclusion. Employees of the crisis centre have also advised to carry out psychological inspection of the daughter who witnessed cruel treatment of her mother. Diana used to bring her daughter for consultation at specialised centre of judicial-medical expertise and the psychologist  made the psychological conclusion  on a condition of the child who witnessed domestic violence conducted by her father over her mother for a long time. Centre "Ekaterina"  found an opportunity to  allocate Diana a lawyer who helped her to make a decision to go ahead with the court proceedings. The lawyer of Sverdlovsk Regional Guild of Lawyers, which has a Contract of Cooperation with the Crisis Centre "Ekaterina",  has undergone special training  on subject of domestic violence and therefore was ready to help Diana through a complex and long court process. Proceedings lasted more than a year due to the accused often not turning up for sessions. On 5 counts of domestic violence the proceedings had to be terminated because incidents happened too far in the past. The lawyer of the accused declared in court that  Diana would never have gone ahead with proceedings if it was not for  the Crisis Centre "Ekaterina" who even gave her lawyer 'to break the family apart‘. In the court the lawyer of the defendant declared that in the Crisis Centres  women get trained ' to shout loud enough so  neighbours can hear how much they suffer'..

The municipal judge in charge of the court proceedings too had special training  on a problem of domestic violence. Under the request of court and Diana' lawyer, the crisis centre presented a Court with the documents confirming the authorisation to act on behalf of victims and describing the organisation's mission. During the trial Diana continued visiting centre psychologist on her free will. We think only support of the lawyer and the psychologist helped her to sustain the court proceeding that lasted  a whole year.

The defendant was found guilty according to article 116 of Criminal Code of Russian Federation (on two counts of beatings),  an article 112 part 1,   an article 130 part 1 (on 3 counts of insults) and an article 119 (murder threats).
He was given 6 months of imprisonment in a colony - settlement, according to article 73 of Russian Federation Criminal Code the punishment was considered to be conditional with a trial period of 1 year. The Court ruled in Diana's favour and the accused had to pay  her 61300 roubles, 50 thousand was an indemnification for mental cruelty, 10 thousand was a payment to her lawyer and 1300 roubles was a  payment for a surgeon and an orthopedist services who helped her to recover after the beatings.

The verdict was made valid and was not appealed against.

According to  judicial statistics the number of cases of private prosecution has increased (by 15%) in the last two years since the project came into force,  domestic tyrants have incurred the deserved punishment and the numbers of cases terminated during investigation has also reduced by 15 percent.
The case study was compiled by Anna Shapar (Project Coordinator)
May 2008

Download this case study in Russian

 

Larissa

Having received help from the Women’s Crisis Centre “Ekaterina”, Larissa told the following story:

Eleven years ago, Larissa married the father of her baby. Larissa is a nurse by training, but now works in a cosmetics salon. Her husband, ten years her senior, is a bank manager. The family lived in a one-roomed apartment, registered in his name, and had a car.

Problems started in the marriage when he started to bring other women home, saying that they were more experienced than her – and then suggested that she be trained in “sexual literacy”. Brought up by a single mother, Larissa did not have experience of close relations with men.

After the birth of her son, her partner became more aggressive. Six months into her second pregnancy, he beat her so badly that she miscarried. Again, she forgave him. She remembers that her partner often talked of his own family - his father beat his mother, for which he had hated his father all his life. He often told Larissa that his own children would be brought up differently.

As time went on, Larissa’s partner drank more frequently, and in a state of intoxication, would shout to the child that she was a “stupid woman”, “bad mistress” and “useless sexual partner”. One day, he slapped her in the face and began to choke her, threatening to kill her, if she dared make a sound. All of this occurred in front of their son, aged just 8½ . So she turned to the police – but the policeman simply advised her to reconcile with her husband, and took no statement from Larissa or her abuser. She gave up trying to bring a criminal case against her partner.

This prompted her partner to take measures against Larissa. He began to deprive her of money for her child, and even more frequently belittled her and threatened her with punishment, in front of their son. Trapped, she even tried to kill herself. Then she decided to appeal to “Ekaterina”, where they advised her to seek help from a lawyer with special training in the problem of domestic violence and private affairs.

With the support of her lawyer, Larissa addressed a complaint to the Chief of the Regional Department of the Police over the lack of action taken by his officer over her initial statement. Only after this did the police take any action. They questioned the victim and perpetrator, and transferred the case to court. The lawyer initially suggested that Larissa’s son go for a psychological investigation at the centre of Forensic Science, as he had witnessed the violence against his mother. The negative influence on the development, mentality and health of children of violence in relations between their parents has been demonstrated through research carried out by Psychologist O.C. Gonina.

The case was heard by the Justice of the Peace N. Kolosova, who had attended the educational programme “Life without Terror”. Larissa’s son did not attend the court hearing, but the judge did question an expert who had carried out a psychological examination on the child. By the standards of Russian law, the verdict passed on this domestic tyrant was severe: a two year suspended sentence, half a year of corrective work and a compensation payment of 25,000 roubles for mental harm he had caused.

Larissa’s shocked partner submitted an appeal against the verdict, protesting that he disagreed with the court, as the child may have been lying at the request of his mother, and had never been questioned in court. He then bought his son a computer, hoping to cajole him over to his “side” prior to an appearance before the higher authority.

The Federal Judge, having studied the evidence of the case, questioned Larissa’s son, in the presence of a teacher, in the courtroom. The boy confirmed all instances of violence against his mum. He also showed the judge a toy plastic dagger, which he had brought to court to protect his mother with. The judge pronounced that the previous sentence would remain upheld. Larissa’s partner, coming out of the courtroom, turned to her and angrily commented: “For ten years I taught you, yet you have still not learnt”.

“Beating”, remarked the judge “- is that what you taught?”

And to his son, his parting words were “I have no need for such a Pavel Morozov, [the young boy who denounced his family to the authorities during Stalin’s purges in the 1930s] in my life!” Incidentally, he soon seized back the computer he had previously presented to his child.

Larissa’s partner made a complaint to the Court of Appeal about the decision of the Federal Judge in the regional court. The case was examined by Regional Judge T. P. Balandina, who had been on a preparatory programme about the problem of domestic violence, participating as a trainer in the “Life without Terror” programme, run for Justices of the Peace by workers of the Crisis Centre “Ekaterina”.

Larissa’s ex-partner again insisted before the court that a child can lie.

Unsurprisingly, the Regional Judge upheld the sentence.

(Compiled by Ludmila Ermakova, April 2007)

Vera

A single woman, doctor by profession, turned to the crisis centre because of the constant battery she suffered at the hands of her brother, with whom she and her parents share a three-bedroom flat. Her mother was against Vera taking measures against the family despot, and so for a long time Vera endured her brother’s taunts. When she decided to go to the police no action was taken and her life became even more desperate. After that, for the first time in her life, Vera turned to the courts. She gave a statement and took the required information. When it was finally heard in court, no substantial or tough punishment was given to the tyrant, and the atmosphere at home was only inflamed. Vera then went to the crisis centre. At first the centre’s legal expert helped her and then she began to go for consultations with a psychologist. Having gone through the first disappointment in court, she no longer wanted to appeal to the justice system, but in time she decided to try appealing to the courts again with the help of a legal expert. The centre’s legal expert accompanied Vera throughout her dealings with the judicial bodies. A judicial investigation was opened and this time the court’s verdict for the aggressor was more severe; he was sentenced to two years suspended sentence and warned that if he offended again he would be imprisoned. Vera’s brother never used physical violence against her again.


Vera has since returned to the crisis centre offering to accompany the centre’s clients on judicial cases, offer moral support and explain the procedure for pressing charges against the aggressor on a voluntary basis. In her own words: “I am so grateful that in my hour of need there was someone there to support me. Just their presence gave me the strength to carry on. I am willing to be that support for other women.”


In the last year, as well as Vera, another of the centre’s clients offered their services free of charge. This woman will assist employees of the centre, rather than the women clients themselves, with organisational work, training and conferences.

(Compiled by Ludmila Ermakova, April 2007)

 
  Page reviewed
on 11/10/07
Visitors since
01/01/05: